Mephedrone isn’t just another obscure research chemical. Everyone’s at it, all the time. Despite the media scare stories, over 20% of mephedrone users polled on Drugs Forum take more than 10g each month, with just under half of those consuming over 20g. A lot of replies to that thread also reveal how quickly usage can escalate, meaning those results are probably on the conservative side. “More acceptable than weed”, some have been saying. “Even my non-druggie friends are doing it!”
Mephedrone has achieved this unusual status thanks to a number of factors. Firstly, it’s an effective stimulant, which is more than can be said for ecstasy and cocaine these days; the former consisting mainly of disagreeable piperazines (due to their cheapness, and until recently, their legal status) rather than MDMA, and the latter being incredibly inpure. Next up is the lack of a comedown that would normally be experienced with other stimulants, especially for new users. This means people can keep taking it for days on end with little to no perceived negative effects. The other major contributor is the price – at around £10 a gram, it undercuts a great many of its illegal counterparts, while often being more effective, or at least more reliable. Other factors include (potentially inaccurate) purity measures, the ease of buying it from the comfort of your own home with a credit card, rather than handing over a fistful of crumpled notes to a typical drug dealer, and of course its legal status. Although the majority of users understand that legal doesn’t mean safe, the fact that you can’t be imprisoned alongside murderers, rapists and other violent criminals for possessing it is certainly a plus. Oh, and it’s psychologically addictive – it won’t kill you if you stop taking it, but you might be able to think of nothing else.
Reports of children doing it, entire friendship groups crumbling as a result of compulsive use and the media frenzy have got people understandably worried and calling for this “evil” drug to be banned.
I Disagree.
Why We Shouldn’t Ban Mephedrone
If you haven’t read Top 10 Reasons Why Legal Highs Should Stay Legal, have a quick look now. Here are a few more mephedrone-specific points:
- Changing the law won’t change demand – we’ve already seen this with the reclassification of cannabis and the massive popularity of the synthetic cannabinoids that just got banned. Also, the decriminalisation of drugs in Portugal has resulted in not only a decline in drug use, but also a decline in drug-related illness and death (HIV from sharing needles, for example), as well as a increase in the number of people seeking treatment for addiction.
- The current classification system doesn’t work – Our current ABC system is a shambles, as any scientist, or indeed anyone that values evidence, will testify. Currently, one of the safest drugs, MDMA, sits alongside one of the (if not the) most dangerous, heroin. Cannabis, and soon the synthetic cannabinoids, which haven’t killed anyone, are positioned alongside amphetamine, a drug with far more potential dangers and addiction, meanwhile alcohol, which hospitalises over 1200 people a day and costs the NHS several billion pounds a year, remains legal along with tobacco. I would estimate the harms of mephedrone to be similar to amphetamine, if not a little worse, but placing it in class B would give the message that it is as dangerous as cannabis. Placing it in class A wouldn’t be right, as it certainly doesn’t appear to be as dangerous as heroin, but it’s probably worse than MDMA. Placing it in class C would be ridiculous, as it suggests cannabis is more dangerous. It would be impossible to have a sensible think on how to classify it properly without getting a headache.
- If mephedrone’s popularity persists, more people will die – in the event of an overdose or an idiosyncratic response, people taking illegal drugs are far more likely not to either tell the doctors what they’ve taken or even go to hospital in the first place. That’s not to say that mephedrone will kill a tonne of people, but if no one ever died whilst on mephedrone, that would be pretty weird…
What Should We Do Instead?
Just because I don’t think it should be illegal doesn’t mean I think the current situation is perfect. Instead, I think the best thing the government could do to reduce harm is keep it legal, restrict its sale to people over the age of 21 and slap on a tax of something like £15 per gram. This would make it much harder to buy large quantities at a time, especially for kids with little expendable income, and so curb mephedrone’s addictive nature. Obviously, this wouldn’t be the perfect solution, as some teenagers would still be able to get hold of it just like they do with alcohol, but at least less people will be taking it and a lot more money would be available to better fund the NHS, harm reduction methods, education about the drug and scientific research.
Why Mephedrone Won’t Be Classified Immediately
Heh. The government have certainly shot themselves in the foot here. Thanks to the sacking of Dave Nutt and the resignation of three others on the ACMD, the government now lacks the skills to ban it. Dr Les King, one of the resignees, was responsible for a large part of the ban last month, so without people like him, the government can’t do anything for a while. Looks like it’ll be legal for a good year or so yet.
How YOU Can Help
Well, you can’t really do anything about the mephedrone situation, but you can help me out by posting Mephedrone Cat everywhere!
You might save millions of lives by directing them to some of my harm reduction articles.


Subscribe By Email
Thursday, 7. January 2010
What I would like to know is why mephedrone wasn’t classified alongside jwh-018 last month.
Christ, our government are useless.
They appear not to be interested in evidence at all.
Evidence shows that children have easier access to illicit drugs, than regulated legal ones.
Evidence show that completely innocent people are harmed/killed by the violence associated with the enormous profits available as a direct result of prohibition.
Evidence shows that criminal gangs support prohibition.
Evidence shows that prohibition increases the potential harm to users.
Evidence shows that the drug war is futile and costs billions.
PS. Nice site btw. Thanks.
Thursday, 14. January 2010
Fantastic and informative post I agree with everything you said. I wish you ran the country then we may have some sense and less phear of being arrested while walking down the street.
Thursday, 14. January 2010
Doobz: It seems like the mephedrone craze began to gain speed after the synthetic cannabinoids had gained their popularity and media attention and by the time mephedrone began to get all the negative coverage in the mainstream media, the legal highs ban concerning the worry-drugs at the time of its writing had been drafted and was making its way to becoming legislation and it was too late to tack mephedrone on to it.
The sacking of David Nutt, as Sync mentioned above, has kind of foiled the government’s ability to do anything about it for the moment, though a new interim head of the ACMD has been appointed. His name is Les Iversen and is a retired Oxford pharmacology Professor. He has expressed some conflicting views in the media in the past so what his current stance on the issues of drug legislation and the circumstances for Dr Nutt’s dismissal is is unsure.
Whether the government have brought him in purely because the body needs a head until they find someone they can rely on to acquiesce to government policy, or whether they want someone there to do something specific with regards to legislature remains to be seen.
Monday, 18. January 2010
“Changing the law won’t change demand” – it did in Israel… demand just reverted to coke and other illicit drugs.
Monday, 18. January 2010
fanyovsky: The demand for a decent stimulant remains. I didn’t mean a demand just for mephedrone.
Your info from Israel posted elsewhere has been very helpful though!
Wednesday, 27. January 2010
I am of later year and still working but come mid afternoon the leaden blanket envelops the brain. Tried Mephedrone for a limited increase of concentration but not good for this – too short and not sharp enough. A 100mg snort is calming and good in the early evening for a slight change of perspective and lasts around 45 minutes. Surprising side effects: noticeable loss of appetite and reduced intake of alcohol and moderate sexual awareness; all these side effects are a plus for me. Point taken about overdosing but personal discipline is important. No death attributed DIRECTLY to Mephedrone so the jury is still out on this but think alcohol for a moment. Most people can handle a larger or two but a bottle of Vodka? Likewise with Mephedrone. I would guess that anyone taking 500 mgs or above is asking for trouble without first getting to know the substance and how your body is reacting to it. There are more deaths from alcohol poisoning than all the deaths attributed to banned substances and legal recreation drugs put together. The drug agencies need informed information on how people react to new substances to do keep a written record of your experiences.
Sunday, 7. February 2010
i think, it would of course be totally unresponsible to not ban mephedrone as fast as possible. at least until it went through appropriate testing and trial procedures. also, i can imagine that the producing standards in the chinese labs that synthesize it, transport conditions and so on are not according to the standards we would usually accept.
it is a “research chemical”! it has never been appropriately tested in animals or humans. noone has for example a clue if and what long-term side effects will appear. but, given the nature of this “product” it should obviously be analyzed and scientifically tested the same way as psychotropic drugs are.
if a pharmacist would sell some new anti-depressant, just fresh out of the research center, he would probably face imprisonment? in my opinion it is btw the same with all these synthetic cannabinoids, the situation there is similar.
argumenting that the risk in both cases might maybe be acceptable for an individual, is ignoring a lot of evidence based science. in our “developed” world we often enough made the for some people very painful experience how important all that testing is. and the occurences regarding the bromo-dragonfly-deaths just a short while ago showed especially the rc-community how important certain standards in production and quality assurance are.
also, given the quite addictive nature of this substance, having substances like mephedrone available as legal products, should also necessitate availibility of proper treatment-possibilities and training of doctors and other medical personel regarding addiction to stimulants that range somewhere between amphetamines and cocaine. i guess we are far from achieving that. although that might be a consequence of the repressive politics in the last decades, it would surely be better to be prepared before an official approval?
Tuesday, 9. February 2010
I’m in two minds about meph I must admit. On the one hand, I have taken it 4 or 5 times recently and had a fantastic night (but I don’t agree there is no comedown, it has made me anxious and low for a few days afterwards). And I will continue to take it in moderation.
On the other hand, I’m a pharmacologist and I agree that it is not necessarily safe to be taking a research chemical that has not been through proper pre-clinical or clinical trial procedures, particularly with the anecdotal evidence of vasculitis and breathing problems.
But I think they key point here is, even if huge amounts of research had been done and the drug was safer than paracetamol, it would still be banned. Because of its effect. It is psychoactive, it is stimulant, and it makes you feel quite nice….which is certainly a no no as far as Governments are concerned.
Sunday, 28. February 2010
i personally love miaow its amazing its cheap easy to get hold of and its all good as long as u dont mix it with a drug such as ketamine its good on a night out with mates or if ur in a club it should stay legal for as long as possible