Nice to meet you, thanks for taking the time to comment.

Unsure if you’ve clearly read what I said on the page above but to clarify my position and give you some more info: BZP is synthetic and not naturally occurring; there were A&E presentations in NZ but the majority of these people who presented to A&E in NZ were not ADMITTED to hospital, most were not serious cases, and none of the recorded cases had followed our dosage instructions In many cases the treatment provided was “verbal reassurance.” There was a thorough analysis carried out of all available hospital records which you can read about at the link below;

As far as I know there is no evidence of neurotoxicity associated with BZP studies, have been carried out in this area, when last I checked on them they were showing BZP users brains as being essentially normal.

meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) is a different compound to BZP, however I am not aware of any cases of mCPP induced psychosis or comparative studies with MDMA. I think methamphetamine would be a better drug to compare BZP to if a comparison were made.

If you are interested in reading more detail on a number of these statements there is a risk analysis and research summary on BZP here http://www.mattbowden.com/PBST-RA-Final-smaller.pdf

I don’t think it is fair comment to suggest in a public forum that I “push” or otherwise present BZP as a “natural” high, I worked hard to correct this misconception over a number of years, perhaps you have confused me with somebody else, if you can back up your statements feel free to do so here.

I understand that the BZP effect is not the most sought after drug effect and that MDMA is a preferred drug but I am comfortable with the way that we have presented its safety profile.

Thanks

Matt