Glad to hear your had no objections to what I actually said. I did have a look around your site at the time and noticed a lot on alcohol and tobacco, but then again, the above quote wasn’t your own words, but those of DrugScope, which is why I didn’t think you’d have a problem with my comment when I posted it.

I’m still wondering though why this site would be inappropriate for your readers? The overall content of this blog isn’t a cheap marketing trick, but rather my hobby — I write about what I do because I think what I do is pretty interesting. While my latest post on kratom for example has a few products at the end, I wouldn’t call a pharmacological discussion of the active alkaloids a great selling tool. In fact, those kind of topics are probably what limits my audience to adults only, much like the topics that you cover do. If that’s the case, I’m sure you wouldn’t advise against any of your responsible adult readers from visiting the pub, so I don’t really see a difference with allowing them to visit my site. At least some of them might find some decent information about “legal high” topics here — I doubt you’d get such a detailed account of a pint of Guinness down at your local.

Still, it’s your blog, and you reserve the right to link to whatever you like. Fortunately, for us humble WordPress users, the “Edit” link above every comment allows you to remove the link, leaving the comment in place, further facilitating discussion. Might be something to consider next time?

Cheers.

Really it wasn’t the content of your comment that I found objectionable — if you took a look around at our blog you’ll have seen that there are many, many more stories about alcohol and tobacco than there have been about legal highs.

What I thought when I came to take a (brief) look at your site was that it was part of an attempt to market legal highs and as such I was wary of publishing your comment.

You may not agree with my reasoning, but given you’ve clearly been annoyed I thought I should at least rectify my mistake of not contacting you privately to let you know why I took that decision.

They have no basis to even present an opinion or evidence.

On the other hand, children should not be using these entheogens. They are not spiritually, soulfully, bodily, mindfully in a place to use any psychaotive. Unless of course, the educators would guide them correctly.

But this isn’t going to happen because the educators live in fear and darkness.

In ancient times and even in some current societies these botanicals are an everyday way of life. Even there the elders guide the young (teenagers) through a rite of passage into becoming an adult with knowledge.